.

"ANTARA BLOG TERBAIK PENGAJIAN TINGGI DI NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL BLOGGING SUMMIT 2011"


MORE THAN A MILLION HITS !

Statistik

SPSS - STATISTIK PENYELIDIKAN SECARA SANTAI

ANTARA TAJUK-TAJUK POPULAR.

Link ke semua Tajuk Popular berikut terletak dibawah ShoutMix.

Tajuk 004 - Ada 11 perkara kajian anda SIGNIFICANCE

Tajuk 014 - Menulis LITERATURE REVIEW yang kritis...sempoiii..

Tajuk 020 - Sample: Purposive atau Convenience atau ?

Tajuk 032 - Kenapa data ordinal tidak normal?

Tajuk 035 - Interpretasi SIGNIFICANT bagi correlation

Tajuk 083 - Sempoinya menulis LITERATURE REVIEW secara kritis !

Tajuk 094 - Tulis PROBLEM STATEMENT tapi TIDAK ADA problem?

Tajuk 100 - Menulis thesis dgn PANTAS "Jika saya menjadi anda"

LINK KE SEMUA TAJUK POPULAR BERIKUT TERLETAK DIBAWAH SHOUTMIX.

Tajuk 119 - Jgn perasan kajian anda boleh ubah policy!

Tajuk 122 - Jgn nak lebeh2 jika guna CORRELATION !

Tajuk 132 - Anda patut lebih TERROR dari supervisor anda !

Tajuk 141 - Tak logic minat RASCH MODEL tapi tak tahu LOGIT?

Tajuk 156 - DROPBOX - File tesis anda dalam bahaya!

Tajuk 184 - Semak Literature Review dgn SIMEC !

Tajuk 185 - Senangnya bina OUTLINE LR !

Tajuk 187 - Tiga rahsia penulisan LR terbongkar... Yezza!

Tajuk 212 - Cari RESEARCH GAP? Gunalah SYNTHESIS MATRIX !!

Tajuk 215 - Kalaulah saya jadi SV.. emmm

Tajuk 233 - CITATION dlm LR – Giler kalau macam ini...!!

Tajuk 238 - Lambat siap tesis – Anda berpenyakit procrastination !

Tajuk 234 - Anda pasti KALUT tanpa PILOT Article

LINK KE SEMUA TAJUK POPULAR BERIKUT TERLETAK DIBAWAH SHOUTMIX.

Tajuk 339 - Thesis: Dont Make It Write, Make It Written !!

Tajuk 240 - "DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS" Jangan pulak anda jadi Pak Pandir.

Tajuk 242 - RESEARCH GAP? - Gunalah HYBRIDIZATION TECHNIQUE

Tajuk 245 - Baca ini anda confirmed kamcing dgn SV

Tajuk 261 - RESEARCH GAP dan Teori Persenyawaan

Tajuk 267 - RESEARCH FRAMEWORK: Kenapa proposal mesti tebal-tebal?

Tajuk 277 - 278: RFOT - Wow !! RESEARCH FRAMEWORK dlm satu mukasurat jer!

Tajuk 279 - Nilai sebuah PROPOSAL..

Tajuk 285 - Thesis dan Awet Muda - Tips untuk suami isteri

LINK KE SEMUA TAJUK POPULAR BERIKUT TERLETAK DIBAWAH SHOUTMIX.

Tajuk 291 - 4 langkah validate + reliability questionnaire

Tajuk 311 - 6 kisah seram calon PhD !!

Tajuk 312 - Anda tak boleh ubah SV, andalah yang perlu berubah !

Tajuk 326 - MENDELEY: Citation + bibliography secara automatik....!

Tajuk 363 - Download template RFOT versi baru dlm MS Word disini !

Tajuk 366 - Empat langkah sempoi tulis paragraph yg KRITIS !!

Tajuk 367 - Bila supervisee jadi BEBAN SV !!

Tajuk 370 – Menulis significance dan Implication of study…

Tajuk 373 - Download desktop calender free here

Tajuk 379 - Download template for writing article AROT

Tajuk 395 - Novelty / Originality kajian anda dipersoalkan?

Tajuk 401 - Download RFOT latest (v4)

Tajuk 405 - Fulamak...Speed Reading (SROT)

Tajuk 417 - 432: Wooow.... ATLAS.TI - 12 Siri Langkah demi langkah

Tajuk 458 - Fulamak...3 Langkah Mudah Gaya UKM Dlm MENDELEY

Tajuk 468 - What is "THE BEST" Thesis?

Tajuk 473 - Sebab supervisee slow sokmo !!

Tajuk 477 - Template RFOT utk download (pdf)

Tajuk 486 - SV timun laut buat kajian singa laut?

Tajuk 487 - Bila Prof nak jadi MARADONA

Tajuk 529 - Calon PhD: Tipah Jgn Tertipu dgn SV !

----------------------------------------

Sila klik link Brochure, Sijil Penyertaan dan Resit yg disediakan di bawah shoutmix.

------------------------------------------------

SENARAI TENTATIF BENGKEL


RINGKASAN BENGKEL:

(1) TULIS TESIS CEPAT = TULIS TESIS CEPAT, LIT. REV. & PENGURUSAN ARTIKEL MENDELEY

(2) SPSS =PENGENALAN ANALISIS DATA KUANTITATIF SPSS

(3) ATLAS.ti = ANALISIS DATA KUALITATIF DGN ATLAS.ti

(4) QNAIRE = BENGKEL BINA DAN ANALISIS SOAL SELIDIK



Daftar dan info : http://www.postgraduateworkshop.com/

Ingin anjur bengkel ditempat anda? Email ke: zahinothman@gmail.com


Sila klik link Brochure, Sijil Penyertaan dan Resit yg disediakan di bawah shoutmix.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sila joint dan sign-in. Anda FOLLOWER kehormat drotspss...

Saya klik Follow dan BANGGA menjadi follower drotspss...

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Tajuk 87: Literature review - 10: Contoh penulisan literature review..

Saya akan sertakan beberapa contoh literature review yang saya hasilkan dalam artikel2 yang saya adalah penulis solo atau penulis utama dan corresponding author sebagai contoh... fair and square kan? Tapi hanya petikan sahaja supaya anda boleh teliti... maka lengkaplah 10 siri Literature Review yang saya paparkan dalam blog saya ini.....


Contoh 1: Contoh "gap" dalam research
Artikel : Segmenttation animation: One way to facilitate students' conceptual change of dynamic sequence concepts


To date, empirical research in technology-based instruction failed to convince the fact that computer animation is superior to static illustration. One of the reasons given is that many animations designed for teaching are limited to attracting students’ attention but not to activate their minds to understand dynamic concepts (Lowe, 2004). Therefore, it is suggested here that computer animation should be presented to students through systematic discrete sequences which allow the teacher or instructor to control the flow of animation segment by segment, which will become meaningful upon integration with prior knowledge. 


Contoh 2: Contoh sokongan kepada claim anda
Artikel: Pembinaan dan Penilaian Prototaip I-OMR


Visual animasi yang digunakan dalam pengajaran kimia organik berupaya membantu menghasilkan simulasi proses yang berlaku. Atas sebab inilah animasi telah dianggap alat paling berkesan untuk diekploitasi dengan cara yang paling optimum bagi menghasilkan pembelajaran bermakna. Animasi “provides a bridge between students’ prior knowledge and the learning of a new physical concept, helping students develop scientific understanding through an active reformulation of their misconception.”Jimoyiannis dan Komis (2001, p.185)

Contoh 3: Mengemukakan teori dalam kajian
Artikel: Prototype Model of Computer-Animated Instruction in Understanding the Fundamental Concepts of Electrochemical Cells


In science education, where knowledge is well-developed and highly structured (West & Pines, 1985), concept development and conceptual change in cognitive structure plays an important role in understanding science concepts. In relation to this, Haney and Czerniak (2003) mentioned that constructivist approaches to teaching and learning has been one of the complete models for explaining the progression of student’s concept development or what generally known as conceptual change. Posner, Strike, Hewson and Gertzog (1982) and; Strike and Posner (1992) proposed a conceptual change model, which established the conditions for conceptual change to take place in teaching and learning. 

Contoh 4: Menunjukkan latarbelakang kajian anda
Artikel: M-learning as tools for learners with background diversity
The last decade has seen significant innovations and improvement in human lifestyle brought by technology namely computers and the Internet (Bachmair, 2007).  These tools are utilized to modernize industrial societies, improve productivity and economic growth. In addition, they also provide opportunities to bring the latest technology into educational institutions, as such linking these institutions to the world of work, economy and technology.  For the educational practitioners the introduction of technology into the educational setting has always attracted them for it is viewed as a tool and enabler to help overcome various educational ills especially with regard to teaching and learning.  

Therefore, in the educational context, there is a growing interest in the latest digital technologies specifically portable tools and their effect on learning (Kress & Patchler, 2007).  These technologies can be employed to help develop learners to become not only active consumers, but also constructors and creators of their own learning.   The concept of teaching and learning has changed and no longer confined to the four walls of a classroom. In fact, learning can be done anywhere and everywhere since the tools afforded by technology have integrated and permeated into every aspect of our lives. As advocated by Kress and Patchler (2007) the use of digital technologies has affected the world in which we live, work and learn.  


Ketika saya menganjurkan satu seminar "tertutup" m-learning


Saya dan sdr Mokhtar (RA saya dan kini tutor yang sdg belajar di US)


Contoh 5: Kritikan terhadap teori pilihan anda
Artikel: Computer-Animated Instruction and students' conceptual change in electrochemistry



Although studies within the conceptual change framework have helped science teachers to understand the important aspects of knowledge construction, there are critiques concerning the practicality of conceptual change approach in science education. The conceptual change approach as argued by Duit and Treagust (2003) has two limitations in the broader realm of science education. Firstly, it focuses only on isolated concepts of science such as electrochemistry, heat, energy, and photosynthesis rather than the changes of overall views of the underlying concepts of the nature of science. Secondly, its approaches do not emphasize affective aspects of learning such as students’ perception towards learning science and motivation. According to Lee, Kwon and Park (2003, p.587) “sometimes, affective reasons are more important than logical/cognitive reason in students’ learning.”


Limon (2001) has claimed that although cognitive conflict seems to be a necessary condition, it is not guaranteed that cognitive conflict will always promote conceptual change.  As pointed out by Chan, Brutis and Bereiter (1997, p.2) students are “often unable to achieve meaningful conflict or to become dissatisfied with their prior conceptions.” There must be strategies where students need to be aware of their dissatisfaction. Cognitive conflict conditions have also been criticized for being too subjective to be traced (Limon, 2001). Furthermore, teachers can only organize and control teaching activities but not the students’ mind. In presenting teaching materials for example, what is considered intelligible and plausible by the teacher might not be considered intelligible and plausible by the students.

In relation to handling discussion or argumentation, one common problem is that some students do not readily give their opinion and participate. Even though it is good to ‘learn from mistakes’, most students are comfortable by just being passive spectators. In cases where students may already have rote learnt knowledge, discussion may become a mere repetition of facts. 


Contoh 6: Perdengarkan suara anda
Artikel: Computer-Animated Instruction and students' conceptual change in electrochemistry



The constructivist theory of learning has been accepted as one of the dominant epistemologies which can be applied to develop theories of teaching and learning in science education (Dethlefs, 2002; Driver & Oldham, 1986; Duit, 1995; Haney, 2003; Martin, 2003). Recent literature in science education states that two pioneering figures, Piaget and Vygotsky are amongst the most significant theoretical pioneers (Epstein, 2003; Graffam, 2003; Haney, Czerniak & Lumpe, 2003; Nussbaum & Sinatra, 2003). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development proposes that learner’s construct their own knowledge through experience, which enables them to create schemas through assimilation and accommodation processes. In short, cognitive development emphasizes conceptual change as an interaction between the learner’s existing schemas and new experience. Therefore, learning occurs when the learner integrates the new experience into existing cognitive structure in a meaningful way. 





Contoh 7: Yang ini lebih lengkap lagi...
Artikel: Uncovering Malaysian Students’ Motivation to Learning Science
Malaysia’s vision to become a developed nation by the year 2020 has placed science and technology as important subjects to excel in. This is especially so since science and technology are often perceived as fundamental forces behind economic development in industrialized countries (Lee, 1989; Loo et al.,1997). Reports on performance in science learning, especially those that highlighted students’ lack of interest as well as declining ability to do science (Kong, 1993; Lee, 2001; MOE, 1998) sparked much concern about the ability to achieve the targetted goals. 

Although there were researches examining factors that influence science learning in Malaysia,
the studies were not comprehensive. Among the aspects investigated include language influence on students’ understanding (Nabilah, 2006; Loo & Sarmiento, 2005); problems with translating and analyzing text, pictures, charts and diagrams as well as failure to come up with the right conceptions of science objects or process (T. Subahan, 1996; Yee, 1998; Othman, 2007); difficulty arising from complexity of terminology and its ideological or technological nature (Mohd Zakaria, 1992); inability to apply process skills (Mohammad Najib, 1999; MOE, 1998), and failure to classify, synthesize and evaluate information (MOE, 1994; MOE, 1995; MOE, 1996; MOE, 2001b). However none of the above aforementioned studies were comprehensive enough to cover the affective, language and cognitive ability determinants of science learning.

This study, which is part of a bigger research, attempts to outline a profile of indicators that
secondary science students in Malaysia need in order to excel in science. Initial observation of science students with excellent academic performance suggests that apart from the way science is taught in classrooms and laboratories, good performance in science subjects is largely the result of numerous interacting factors, both internal as well as external to the students. Amongst others, these include the students’ English language proficiency (as science is currently taught in English), cognitive ability, talent, the right attitude towards science learning as well as their social support system. For the past twenty years, most research examining factors influencing science learning focused primarily on the cognitive domain, particularly investigations on conceptual understanding, and misconceptions held, of science concepts. However, in more recent years, attention has been paid on how students’ affective,
social and value domains (Weinburgh, 1995; Bloom, 1992; 1995) affect their science learning
outcomes.



So... selamat menulis.... terima kasih kepada team research saya yang turut bersama menyumbang kepada petikan artikel di atas.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...